The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Emmy, Austin, TX — Sat, 10 May 2008 02:22:52 GMT

Long ago, I stopped watching CBS's "48 Hours" because I couldn't
stomach the endless parade of cases in which there was no evidence, but
there was, nevertheless, a conviction. The convictions are based on
plots cooked up by ambitious cops and DAs who want to close a case, and
don't particularly care whether it's pinned on the right person, as
long as they think they can spin a tale that's good enough to convince
a gullible jury that has been brainwashed by years of watching "Law and
Order" and "CSI" into believing that, if the State is putting someone
on trial, they must have the right person.

Tonight I turned off "Dateline" mid-program, and I have relegated it to
the same trash heap as "48 Hours".

I simply cannot watch one more self-righteous, but ignorant, in-law of a
victim spewing venom about how the accused husband or wife wasn't
crying at the "appropriate" times, so he/she must be a murderer.
Here's a newsflash for NBC News: people grieve in different ways. ANY
psychologist, even one who doesn't specialize in grief, will confirm
this. Thirty years ago my father died very suddenly. My boyfriend
drove me home, and would have confirmed, if you had put him on camera,
that I didn't shed a tear during the entire 200-mile trip. I didn't
cry at the funeral, either. If someone like the bimbo sister-in-law on
tonight's "Dateline" had been there, taking notes on the demeanor of
her fellow funeral-goers as she apparently was at her sister-in-law's
funeral, then she would have undoubtedly been able to tell your
reporter that I must have killed my father, since I was not crying at
his funeral. I assure you that we were a close, loving, family, and
that there was no foul play involved in my father's death. I did not
allow myself to break down, however. My mother was crying enough for
everyone, and someone--me, a young coed--had to "man up", so
to speak, and figure out what was going to happen to the family without
my father. I literally did not have the bandwidth to break down. I
had a funeral to arrange, and a future to plan. And, yes, I *totally*
recognize that some other people in that identical situation
nevertheless manage to cry their eyes out, sometimes while
simultaneously shoving their faces into TV cameras. My point is that
you--"Dateline" producers who are presumably doing "news", not "cop
fiction"--should show just a modicum of balance by always having an
expert who immediately follows the
he-must-have-done-it-because-he-wasn't-crying amateur, and explains how
the range of *real* people actually behave.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

donna Irwin — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:03:45 GMT

Did they give the husband a lie dectector test? Also, how can they really be sure that the murder took place at 5:30 or 5:45 as opposed to 5:00??? That's not that big of a time difference. He could have done it before he left the store for his mom's house.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

John Doe — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:06:30 GMT

This man is innocent.
After watching this dateline report it did not convince me that he did this murder.
Everything was he said/she said...there was no physical evidence! You do not put a man in jail if there is a resonable doubt.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Penny E., Greensburg, Pa. — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:06:33 GMT

I think the jury got it right. It would be a travesty of justice to not honor their unanimous decision.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Dallas Lazar, Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:09:56 GMT

This is a case of a police department that fately erred in a investigation, a lead prosecutor who is out to get closure for not only "the people" but his late father who was part of this "mickey mouse" police department. No murder weapon, no hard evidence, and yet a guilty verdict. It raises only one question: "Can the police ever be trusted?" It's a catch 22 in the legal system: Get a lawyer and you look guilty, Don't get one and they will make you guilty.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jeff C, Cincinnati, OH — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:11:59 GMT

This case is clear example of the weakness in the justice system in this country. Obviously, there was reasonable doubt in this case, and the jurors let their emotions get the better of them. A 7-5 guilty to not-guilty vote on Friday afternoon, and then after another deliberation on Monday, a unanimous guilty verdict? Wow....clearly sounds like some jurors were pressured by their peers to make a decision that didn't make sense.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Stephanie, Raleigh, NC — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:20:01 GMT

I just watched the show and I am surprised no one brought up the possibility of the girlfriend driving Michael to the shop or going herself and committing this murder herself. Did anyone ask where she was? And I agree, that was some inadequate investigation by the police. (They didn't even test him for gun residue or the phone records?) I believe he did it or had it done, but I don't believe it was a good case the prosecution brought against him to prove it.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Doug M Fargo,ND — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:23:24 GMT

It is absolutely ridiculous to find this man guilty. How can u find someone guilty without any shred of evidence?
As I watched this show unfold I found myself more and more appalled at the actions of the prosecutors as the show went on. They convicted that man on their own moral obligations. Words cannot even describe the astonishment I feel at this time. It is just beyond belief that something like this can happen..and it does in this great country of ours. How can anyone with any sense of decency and conscious say there was not a reasonable doubt? HOW? they had absolutely ZERO evidence.When and not IF this case is overturned they should indict that entire prosecution team on grounds of abusing their power. I could just feel the funnel sucking all these people in as the prosecution presented it's extremely weak case, and my mind turned to a small town I was raised in and that is what you have...small town politics. These people in these small towns, prosecutors and police have the power to do as they wish, and this case proved it. I would ask dateline to present this evidence, and don't mention this particular case, to lead prosecutors across the country in the 20 largest cities in the country. And ask them if they would have tried this case based on the facts presented. I would be willing to bet 85-90% would simply say there is no case to speak of, without any shred of physical evidence. As citizens of this country you should be devastated at this verdict and more so the acts of the prosecution and jury for bringing this case where it was. The man was an immoral pig. That does not make him a murderer. And to convict a man based on one mans testimony, I'm sure being in the wheel chair made him even more credible in these peoples mind, that his guy answered the phone at the time the murders were committed is atrocious. There was not even phone records that this phone call took place. Wouldn't someone logically ask themselves could the man simply have mistaken the time he placed the call? You are putting a man in prison for the rest of his life based on a phone call that you have been presented with no proof that took place. The rights of this man as a US citizen were violated. This was a witch hunt. And they happened to find jurors who believed this hogwash. Those jurors should be ashamed of themselves. You got caught up in the moment. If you can look the Lord in the eyes at the day of your calling and say you made that decision based on facts and had no reasonable doubts, I would love to hear how you came to the reasoning you did. Amazing. Just simply amazing.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jim Forsyth, Davenport, IA — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:24:29 GMT

I am stunned at the verdict in the Comic Book Murder case. How a man can be convicted after all these years with such little and in some cases no evidence is astonishing to me. All I heard from the jurors was that he was a womanizer and a liar. No doubt he made some bad choices, but there was nothing there to convict. Where was reasonable doubt in this case? Unless there is something about the case that was not aired, the judge has to overturn the verdict.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

beverley cochran, carthage, missouri — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:30:58 GMT

Regarding The strange "LITTLE" (man?) with the obvious fake, fake, fake full around the mouth beard. Why did the police not consider that it may have been his girlfriend? Did she show up for the birthday party that night? She surly would have been invited since she worked there and was supposed to be a friend to the murdered wife. She had five children to support, she was in an affair with the accused, she knew he wanted a divorce and the wife was NOT going to ever give him one. Some women and men can get desperate! They both knew the only way they could be together was if the wife was dead. Why didn't the police search her house for the gun and the beard, etc.?

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Paul Bachner, Downers Grove, IL — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:38:02 GMT

This comment is for the producers of this show. I have watched week after week when you consistently show how the long arm of the law always gets it's man. I would like it if the show producers could shift gears for say 6 weeks and show how the goverment got it wrong! How innocent people went to jail for say years, wrongly convicted. Where the prosecution was so sure they got the right man. There are certantly enough example in the news that can show how a persons actions may be suspicious, but does not mean they are guilty. Are you prepared to show the other side of the law. That the government has even hide evidence that could prove one's innocents. And no, I have never been convicted of a crime or been accused of one. What I have seen is the media showing how the police are always right and that they always get the right person. And that the mention that people have spent years in jail for a crime they didn't commit doesn't get shown very often. The common speculation that 10% of people in jail are really innocent!

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

yasi, nyc, ny — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:39:46 GMT

it's obvious george murdered his wife even though there weren't physical evidence to proove that. i hope george stays in jail for the crime he did which i'm pretty sure he did. why didn't he cry or show any emotion when he learned of his wife's murder?? why did he cry so much for so long when he learned that he's guilty? i know people react differntly especially in a state of shock..its understandble...but how come he cried when in the courtroom? even if you hate someone, you would cry a little bit and show some emotion when you know that person died...especially if you've been with that person living together for a long time. i think he had some evil hidden plan for her murder...and if he did kill her he deserves to be in prison...and i think the jury made the right decision...i feel bad for his kids but that's what he gets...

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jonny, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:47:25 GMT

I've watched many of these types of shows but have never seen one before where I actually knew, and helped the man being convicted. I have to say that the evidence in this case was not just a joke but mostly non-existent. I also think that you can't convict a man because he shows no emotion for the death of a loved one, maybe he just really didn't like his wife. I don't know if he's innocent but I don't know if he's guilty either and that's why he shouldn't have been found guilty in the first place. Seeing him cry like that at the end, he always seemed like such a strong guy, it's a shame.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

mehdi, nyc, ny — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:47:42 GMT

you do not need physical evidence to proove something...you can tell when someone is lying and is guilty without all that...and he just got caught...everyone knew it ...and i just regret that the police dept didn't carry out the case in a good way...they should've looked at the girlfriend..looked for gun residues etc...anyway george is the murderer...u can see it by lookin at his eyes..he doesn't care..he only cares about himself and was just sad all his efforts went to waste...no one else did this...there was no robbery or else they wouldve obviously taken her bracelet and the other money..its obvious it's george...

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Daryl C, New Richmond, WI — Sat, 10 May 2008 03:49:28 GMT

It appears to me that this case should never have been tried. For all the evidence to be so circumstantial it was simply a case of he said she said. Like others have said the only thing that the jury really brought up is that he wasn't the best husband and he was unfaithful, but that doesn't make him a murderer. In my opinion the case should be thrown out and the accused set free, this case was simply a travesty of justice and an abuse of power by the prosecution office as they are on a witch hunt to try and settle a score for good old dad since he couldn't get the case solved.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

John Doe — Sat, 10 May 2008 04:27:12 GMT

Remember, the crime took place in a busy mall where people knew the couple well. I would think at least someone would notice the husband or his car if he drove back to the store to commit the crime.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jake Cola — Sat, 10 May 2008 04:39:18 GMT

Anyone who believes this man got what he deserved is acting on pure emotion. Justice is at stake people! I want to emphasis how important it is to PROVE guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. First, no person should face the humiliation of trial and public opinion, the devastation of conviction, and the punishment of lifetime confinement unless they are proven (with hard evidence and unquestionable investigative technique) to have committed the crime. One conviction based on here-say, absence of evidence, and/or disdain for another’s character, alone, is one too many. The jurors and jurists in this case may have committed a crime equal to the one tried. Secondly, and equally important, this type of finger-pointing, gossip, and resulting lynching can happen to any one of us. It’s time we stop this courtroom horror.

The fact, and the ONLY FACT in the entire proceeding, is it should never have gone to trial in the first place. The judge almost had it right to begin with. He should be ashamed for handing this man over to the hormonal, self-righteous lynching mob of twelve.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Psychologist — Sat, 10 May 2008 05:14:22 GMT

In regard to the post addressing crying behavior, I am a psychologist and it is absolutely correct that people grieve differently. It bothers me greatly when people state that because someone was NOT crying after a traumatic event, they must be guilty or abnormal in some way.

That being said, there are other facts presented in this case that describe Michael George's behavior and that are, in fact, quite abnormal. To name a few of many: having a disproportionately large life insurance policy on his wife compared to his own, his lack of concern for what exactly happened to his wife when first told by the police that she was "injured," his demeanor with another woman at his own wife's funeral, his lack of concern or curiousity upon being told by police that the case was being re-opened. As a psychologist, it is very clear to me that this man not only did not care about the feelings of his wife, but that he very much wanted her gone. GUILTY.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jean Gifford, Davis, CA — Sat, 10 May 2008 06:16:19 GMT

Yes, the evidence was sketchy and somewhat contradictory, but the key for me is what the defendant said and did when he was first told that his wife had "had an accident". At that point, she had been removed to the hospital and had been declared dead there. Only after she was declared dead, did the hospital personnel discover the bullet wound in her head. He was, by his own statement, returning to the store after a nap at his mother's. Without going into the store, he made statements to the police about her being in the backroom and about a head injury. I can think of many more things he could have said if the facts were as he stated: "What kind of accident?", "Where is she?", "Did she fall?", "Did it happen in the store?", "How hurt is she?", etc. Instead of any of these logical questions, he begins talking about a head injury in the back room. As far as I'm concerned, that clinched it for me.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Charles B. Santa Barbara, CA — Sat, 10 May 2008 06:18:29 GMT

So, basically, this man finds himself convicted of murder because he is a philandering jerk who didn't have the wisdom to sob on cue at the time of his wife's death. Let's admit the possibility, even the likelihood, that he either arranged or committed his wife's murder. And let's admit that circumstantial evidence alone may be enough to return a guilty verdict. This case still falls woefully short. Do these jurors, who are so happy to be interviewed and so complacent in the certainty of their judgment, have the slightest concept of the term "reasonable doubt." I particularly appreciated Dateline including the obligatory interview with the prosecutor where he snickers at the hapless defendant's crocodile tears. It seems like the weaker a prosecutor's case is, the more glee he takes in sending his man to the gallows.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

ASR Los Angeles — Sat, 10 May 2008 06:19:07 GMT

I never blog...never. But this got me so enraged I had to say something. This is a travesty of justice! This poor man has to suffer some son's crusade to get one back "for the old man." Well if the old man wasn't so incompetent he would have done good police work and found proof, which he didn't, which is the reason the case went cold in the first place. Now, his son, as smug as he could be, brings this case back, with even less evidence, and this RIDICULOUS JURY!!! finds him guilty of what? Poor judgment? Extra marital affairs? So the guys a pig? Who cares? He's not a murderer. The fact that those moron jurors fell for years of small town water cooler speculation is a TRAVESTY! My blood is still boiling over this! And the guy in the wheel chair...hero complex anyone? He is really so sure after seventeen years that he didn't call at five? Maybe he just smoked a joint. Time sure distorts under those influences. Did anyone ask him this? Those jurors were a joke, and I hope their nights are sleepless for what they did to this poor man and his family. They were the most incompetent, ignorant people I have ever had the misfortune of laying eyes on. I'm disgusted! Please, please, please put me on this jury! What happened to unbiased due process. A damn shame!

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Ginger Dires, Battle Creek, MI — Sat, 10 May 2008 07:21:43 GMT

Congratulations to the jury and the man in the wheelchair for having the courage to do the right thing, very brave. Dateline, great job for covering this story, it was very worthwhile and had all the makings of a classic murder case.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

James Hawk, III — Sat, 10 May 2008 08:50:21 GMT

The level of rhetoric here is astounding, given that most of the arguments in favor of innocence involve ad hominem arguments against the police and relatives, and speculation as to how people grieve. Emotion isn't the way to approach the analysis of the case.

The defendent's own statements suggest he knew a lot more than he should have. The bit about his mother's neighbor seeing his van at the trailer means nothing--the woman saw a van. She didn't see the man himself. 17-year-old memories looking back to a time when the daughter was four years old can't be taken as accurate; very few people have solid memories of their time at four years old, even for events as traumatic as this. (I'm not attacking the daughter. I'm sure she is being as honest and forthright as would be possible under the circumstances. I'm sure she believes her testimony to be accurate. I'm pointing out that four-year-olds, on the whole, are not very dependable witnesses, and testimony taken that much longer after the fact has to be suspected as inaccurate to some degree. She could simply be remembering a different day, or remembering a common image of her father sleeping while she was a child.)

The man condemned himself by his own testimony over the years. His accounts changed, his behavior changed, and that speaks volumes in a way that empirical evidence couldn't provide. Why, when the detectives showed up years later, did he not immediately conclude that they'd finally gotten the person responsible. Where was "did you finally catch the b-----d that killed my wife?" No, instead, he went pale and scared. That says guilt. He knew they were back for him--and he knew why they were back for him. A truly innocent man would have welcomed them there. Perhaps not enough for a guilty verdict, I'll warrant--but very compelling evidence just the same.

I agree that adulterers aren't necessarily murderers--but anyone who can break marriage vows can find ways to step out of bounds in other areas, too. As observed by Robert Heinlein--"A poet who reads his verse in public may have other nasty habits."

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jon D, Vancouver, WA — Sat, 10 May 2008 12:21:00 GMT

I think the husband absolutely committed the murder, however, based on the evidence presented ON THE SHOW, I simply would not have voted for conviction. The burden of proof was not satisfied in my opinion in the two hour show. Having said that, none of us (presumably) were there to listen to the other 3 weeks of testimony. Remember this is a television show that shows the highlights based on the intentional or unintentional prejudices of the show's producers, etc. Let's remember that the 12 jurors who DID listen and watch for the full three weeks were unanimous in their decision.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Audi, Cary, North Carolina — Sat, 10 May 2008 12:47:12 GMT

My hat off to the clear thinking and courage of the jury who found this selfish evil murderer guilty. He thought he got away with murder! This is a classic murder case based purely on strong circumstancial evidence. The jury could have easily said "there's reasonable doubt because there are no physical evidence -- gun, DNA, etc". But the jurors were intelligent and impartial enough to see the inner workings and details of this case. The judge saw the same. I'm very happy with their decision!

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

R. D. Converse, Silver City NM — Sat, 10 May 2008 13:38:05 GMT

While it is true that juries often get it wrong, this wasn't one of those times. Just because a smoking gun isn't present, it doesn't mean that other evidence shouldn't be considered. This guy had motive, opportunity and was his own worst enemy. If your wife has been gunned down, since when do you not give the police your full cooperation? Wouldn't you want to tell them everything you know and continue to communicate with them to see that the killer was cauaght? Not this guy. He quits talking to the police, collects the insurance money and moves in with his sweetie. These are the actions of an innocent person? Give me a break. This guy got exactly what he deserved.

As to the judge, what is the point of a jury if the judge is going to make the ruling on his own? If this judge (who has already demonstrated that he is as weak as they come) overturns the jury verdict, then he is in effect saying his opinion is better than 12 jurors. If that is so, why even continue to bother with jury trials? He is simply one opinion (and, no, he isn't any better qualified to render an opinion; everyone's opinion is as good ... or as bad ... as anyone else's).

Forget the lack of grief 17 years ago. It is true that people grieve differently. But now the defendant breaks down after the verdict? Right. The only thing he crying about is that he got caught. He's right where he deserves to be.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

dateline fan, baltimore, MD — Sat, 10 May 2008 13:42:48 GMT

OK, put aside the substance of this case for just a moment -- let's talk entertainment value! I can still hear Mike's wails and moans! I hope his lawyer put the drycleaning bill on his expenses! I have never seen an adult act with such indignity -- for such a prolonged period. It was great! I'm sure Mike's prison buddies are avoiding him in the breakfast line this morning. Man, Dateline should have been using that all over its promotion --- at least in the last half hour!

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Debra — Sat, 10 May 2008 13:59:19 GMT

I am in total agreement with Emmy. I am tired of "they didn't cry" so therefore they must be guilty and or "they are crying now but because they got caught." This is not what you base a case on. Detectives cannot tell you the "right way" to respond.Their is no right way. We all react differently. As for the case, I am not sure 100% of his guilt. I don't think it was proven beyond a doubt.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Steve Barnes, Hailey ID — Sat, 10 May 2008 14:12:19 GMT

I was disgusyed with the verdict. The accused is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I could believe he did it, but there was no evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. I knew they'd find him guilty or else it wouldn't be on Dateline. The jury was reckless and ignorant.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Pamela Walker, Shreve, Ohio — Sat, 10 May 2008 14:27:48 GMT

The strangely dressed "man", could it have been the girlfriend, she also had motive. I did not hear of investigation of her. I wonder if he pulled the trigger, or did she, I am just not convinced. I feel in my heart he had something to do with it, but I wonder about the girlfriend.What was this man's demeanor at his mother's upon "waking"? If he was as nervous as the caller said, would he not still be anxious?

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

silverfox, WI — Sat, 10 May 2008 15:27:35 GMT

He may have done it...he may not have. Point is...they sure didn't prove he did it. The jury is way wrong. The trial spent most of the time trying to prove whether or not Michael George was there at the shop around the time of the murder. The prosecution couldn't prove he was but the defense had proved he wasn't with more witnesses. And...even if he WAS there AROUND the time of the murder does NOT make him guilty. The murder could have taken place a minute after he left. WAY too many crimes are going to court now days promoted by over zealous cops and prosecuting attorneys. The trials go on and on with he said she said "evidence" and then the jury gets to pick which story to believe. HUNH!? Whatever happened to physical evidence?? NO jury should even consider choosing between two STORIES. If there is no evidence then the verdict should ALWAYS be NOT guilty. I'm sick and tired of innocent people going to prison...sometimes for life, or worse, death, based on the ego of some prosecutor with no concrete evidence what so ever. And even if they are NOT innocent...the law is the law. You have to PROVE guilt. This guy may, indeed, be guilty. But they sure as hell didn't PROVE it.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

RS, Greene, Tennessee — Sat, 10 May 2008 15:39:30 GMT

GUILTY........BUT, not a shred of evidence to proof it. The cop shop blew it. Many things in the case that I read mentioned a small man w/ beard, hmmmm. Those time lines could be off by many many minutes in either direction, before or after he left the shop. It is a real shame that this man should be set free, simply from lack of proof. Much doubt here.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

TOM/ Balitmore/ MD — Sat, 10 May 2008 15:45:58 GMT

This case just shows another display of an unjust system; Also this Judge is a coward for not standing up and throwing this case out from the start: he is like pontious pilot. and as for the jury; the will never have any luck in there lives for what they did ! the ones that caved in to the demands and pressure of thier peers; NOW you can GO home and EAT YOUR SUPPER ! This is one of the worst cases I have ever seen: NOT ONE SHREAD of PHYSICAL PROOF ! MAY ALL WHO CONVICTED THIS MAY BE DAMMED FOREVER !!!

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Linda, Houston, Texas — Sat, 10 May 2008 16:36:09 GMT

This is ridiculous. I hope that I am never accused of a crime and my life is put in the hands of 12 ignorant people. There is ALL doubt in this case. Apparently we do not need any evidence any more to convict anyone. I am so sick of people being judged by how they grieve. If they cry, they are faking it. If they do not cry, they are guilty. Everyone grieves differently. Some people are in shock and can’t cry.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Mrs. John Doe, Windber, PA — Sat, 10 May 2008 16:36:53 GMT

After watching this program, I too am astonished that this jury could convict this man for murder with so little evidence with so many other viable suspects. This police department messed up over and over again and then years later during a trial (that never should have taken place)is causing people to take time out of this lives to ponder "Could something like this happen to me?". I agree with Doug M. Fargo. "To convict a man based on one mans testimony" when there was not even phone records that this phone call took place. Wouldn't someone logically ask themselves could the man simply have mistaken the time he placed the call?". I'm sure everyone is playing detective on this case and it is going to make a great TV movie. Let me offer start by offering another suspect namely Mr. Renaud. You have a college student, "Spiderman" fanatic and avid collector. Did anyone confirm that he was in fact at work when he made the call? If he was at work he just confessed that he is a thief because he was stealing from his employer by making a personal phone call when he should have been working. Also, what did he do with this valuable comic book he was so eager to talk about? How many more valuable comic books does he have? Does he still collect them? Maybe, he was one of the suspious looking people seen at the mall? Maybe, he was there trying to score a "valuable" commic book and an attempt to walk away them he made a stupid "kid" mistake and then compounded it by creating the phone call story in an attempt to create an alibi for him and maybe his friend from work if the police eventually placed them at the crime scene. I realize I am streching this theory, but lets be real, without concrete evidence anyone could take any of the people involved in this case and create a suspect. Mr. George may not have been in love with his wife and been a womenaizer at this time but that doesn't mean he killed his wife for $130,000.00 life insurance policy. My husband has as much life insurance on me as on himself. Why, because he owns his own business and because I work and contribute to our household finances. Insurance Agents don't make money if they don't sell insurance and our agent didn't hesitate or question our motives when we were looking to buy insurance at the beginning of our marriage. Why? Because we told him what we could afford in premiums and wanted the coverage so I was sure my family would be properly cared for while my husband continued building his business if anything were to happen to me. So...why would this even be considered and make you a prime suspect for killing your spouse. I'm sure Mrs. George knew how much insurance they had on each other, she had to sign the insurance application. Mr. George doesn't appear to be stupid enough to risk life in prison or the death penalty for $130,000.00. Mr. George created a sucessful business not once but twice. If you can relocate to another state, purchase a home, support a new wife, your children, her children and open a business selling comic books in a small town like Windber, PA (where business close up shop as fast as they open)and the police found you at your business 17 years later and you did on only $130,000.00 you are not a stupid person but someone my husband should be taking to to help him run his business.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

South Calif — Sat, 10 May 2008 16:39:17 GMT

Hmmmmm A woman that had five children to support and involved with a married man who owed a business had a lot to gain if Michael Georges wife was taken out of the picture. I believe Michael Georges girlfriend was involved in this murder. It was obvious! Where in the hell was Michaels girlfriend during the time of the murder? Maybe she did it! Maybe Michaels girlfriend had plans to have his wife murdered! Men do stupid things when they start thinking with their "little head". Did you notice how Michaels girlfriend/NEW WIFE started hiding her face from the cameras after they read the guilty verdict??? Wish the police investigated Michaels girlfriend/NEW WIFEs past. I think both of them where involved.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

BRYAN, HOUSTON, TX — Sat, 10 May 2008 17:00:58 GMT

I AM A RETIRED HOMICIDE INVESTIGATOR, AS MUCH AS I HAVE READ, THIS CASE WOULD NOT HAVE EVEN BEEN FILED TO GO TO TRIAL IN OUR COUNTY. WE THE PUBLIC ONLY HAVE THE FACTS THE COURTS RELEASED TO THE MEDIA. I AGREE WITH THE COMMENTS OF AN UNJUST VERDICT, THERE IS A GREAT NEED FOR PHYSICAL EVIDENCE TO BE PRESENTED FOR A CONVICTION. IN LIFE A PERSON CAN BE 100% RIGHT AND IT TAKES ONLY A FEW TO MAKE IT APPEAR YOU ARE IN THE WRONG. IT IS APPEARS THE PROSECUTION USED EMOTIONS TO GET A CONVICTION AND NOT THE FACTS. I INVESTIGATED MANY MURDERS AND WAS INVOLVED IN MANY MURDER TRIALS, WHICH INCLUDED DEATH PENALTY CASES. I CAN SLEEP AT NIGHT, KNOWING THAT I DID THE BEST JOB POSSIBLE AND HAD, MORE THAN ENOUGH PHYSICAL AND CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE FOR A CONVICTION. THE RULE OF THUMB IN INVETIGATING ANY MURDER IS, EVERYONE IS A SUSPECT AND THE INVESTIGTOR ELIMATES EACH PERSON AS A SUSPECT THROUGH PHYSICAL AND CIRCUMSTANCIAL EVIDENCE, ESPECIALLY IN THIS CASE. IT IS OBVIOUS ROBBERY WAS NOT THE MOTIVE AND THE VICTIM KNEW HER KILLER. ANYONE THAT MADE CONTACT WITH THE VICTIM, IN THE LAST HOURS OF HER LIFE, THE INVESTIGATORS ON THE SCENE SHOULD HAVE PROCESSED EACH INDIVIUAL WITH WRITTEN STATEMENTS, POWDER REISDUE ON THE HANDS, COLLECTED DNA, EXPANED THE CRIME SCENE, OUTSIDE, TO THE FRONT AND BACK OF THE SHOP. (THE SPEEDING CAR LEAVING THE SCENE). THERE ARE MANY MORE PROCEDURES TO FOLLOW DURING THE INVESTIGATION ON THE SCENE AND THE FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATION. IT IS HARD TO CLEAR ANY COLD CASE, EVEN WHEN PHYSICAL EVIDENCE IS COLLECTED, WITNESSES VANISH OR MEMORY IS BLURRED. EVIDENCE IS LOST OR TAINTED OVER THE YEARS, BUT IN THIS CASE IT APPEARS NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, LINKING THE SUSPECT, WAS EVER COLLECTED. I DOUBT IF THE TRUTH OF THIS POOR WOMAN'S DEMISE WILL EVER SURFACE, BUT WHO EVER COMMITTED THE MURDER, WILL HAVE SIT IN JUDGEMENT, EVENTUALLY, BEFORE GOD AND GOD WILL HAVE THIS PERSON PAY THE PRICE FOR TAKING THE LIFE OF ONE OF HIS CHILDREN.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Wa;ter — Sat, 10 May 2008 17:36:39 GMT

The mother's neighbor stated she saw his van in the driveway, while one of the witnesses at the store saw him putting his kids in a car and driving away around 5 PM. There was no testimony on TV that explained the difference between the car and the van.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Karen, Windber, PA — Sat, 10 May 2008 17:54:51 GMT

Why didn't dateline interview more people in Windber,PA where the George's lived for 17 years. If he was the kind of man they portrayed him to be, then why was he still a devoted husband to Renee and father to her children and his after 17 years. The detective work in this case was terrible. Knowing Mike and Renee through the years, and the concern and kindness he showed to her portrays a loving man and not the kind that Dateline was showing.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Dennis Keener, York, pa. — Sat, 10 May 2008 17:58:23 GMT

Everyone on this jury should be totally ashamed
of there verdict. This was not justice.What an outrage
to send someone to prison without a shred of evidence.
Guilty based on speculation by many people including those on the jury. Shame on the ones who didn't have the guts to stand there ground to the ones who pushed
for a guilty verdict.Where on earth are peoples minds when they sit on a jury. This is not a soap opera people.You do not owe the victims family a guilty verdict out of compassion or because they think they are absolutely sure the accused done it. It has been said and I have come to agree,that it is better to let a murderer go free,than to send an innocent man
to prison or death. Innocent till proven guilty beyond
a reasonable doubt. The only guilt proven in this case was the incompitence of law enforcement and an ego driven DA to make his father's legacy look unblemished. In closing I believe the the man had something to do with the murder or knows who may have done it. I seen no evidence whatsoever of even a
shred of evidence. Wake up jurors of America.You are not acting in a soap opera when you sit on a jury.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Ryan, Troy, MI — Sat, 10 May 2008 20:40:50 GMT

The right person was convicted. He had a motive, a weak alibi, flawed character and changing stories. The robbery angle is preposterous. Why in the world would he have $30,000 worth of valuable comic books in boxes in the back and not locked up in a safe? He was the benefactor of faulty police work and should feel lucky that he got away with the crime for 17 years.

I was a regular customer in that store when I was a kid and remember Barbara George as being a wonderful person. I'm glad that her family will finally have some closure.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

SP, Los Angeles, CA — Sat, 10 May 2008 20:50:57 GMT

Basing my remarks according to the material presented on the show this is exactly what happened to OJ but it was to his favor: emotional verdict not representing the evidence given.

The jury had some nerve to say the police department should be "ashamed of themselves" for poor a investigation. I found it even more appalling the department originally dropped their investigation for "more important cases".

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

mjk NH — Sat, 10 May 2008 21:12:25 GMT

I think, even scarier than the verdict of this case, is that you or I or almost anyone else could be in the defendants shoes. Strung up on zero evidence and sent away for our entire lives.

UNLESS you were part of the criminal justice system, like a cop or prosecutor, or a politician. They protect their own from cases like this that lack evidence. Even cases with an abundance of evidence, like the Sean Bell case where 3 undercover cops got trigger happy and put nearly 50 bullets into 3 unarmed, non-hostile civilians (the cops all went free, of course). Contrast that with this comic book murder case, where there was zero evidence, yet still a conviction.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

andy armstrong Calgary, Alberta, Canada — Sat, 10 May 2008 21:19:43 GMT

I believe that he is guilty but I do not believe that the state proved their case and thus there should have been a not guilty verdict.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jane Doe, Windber, PA — Sun, 11 May 2008 01:19:43 GMT

I agree with the "lack of evidence" - it is scary to think that anyone could be convicted of killing someone by the minimal evidence that was presented in this case!! As for calling Windber "a rundown coal-mining town" - I object!! We are proud of our town and the people in it do their best to make a good life for their families. How long was Dateline in town?? One day?? Due to the lack of funding that comes into small-town America, and thanks to the Republican President who disagrees with certain funding programs to help small-towns like Windber, Windber can't compete with larger municipalities that receive large loans to fix up their roads and infrastructure!! We are proud of our little town of "4,000" and do not appreciate what we were made out to be!!

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Maria C., San Bernardino, CA — Sun, 11 May 2008 01:31:03 GMT

In this case, the circumstantial evidence points that this man did not care. He claims he wasn't there, that he answered no phone. He was having an affair with the co-worker (who must have known something and should probably be looked at herself as someone culpable). He had an insurance policy that barely covered him, but ensured that if his wife were to die things would be comfortable. Emotions can be tricky where the loved one can't cry (but can't sleep either). Grief is tricky at times but follows a pattern that most people take. Absolute devastation sometimes. Anger (where was his in any of it? His wife was MURDERED!) and deep sadness. Hugging a vacuum is "bad acting". Hitting on other women (especially in front of the deceased) smacks of something dreadfully wrong.
Go ahead and be the devil's advocate. That guy is a liar, cheater, and a murderer. Would you like for maybe all the really smart criminals to get away with their crimes because a person's testimony is not "strong" enough for you?

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

iowan — Sun, 11 May 2008 06:19:49 GMT

The evidence is circumstantial but the defendant's asking the police about details of the murder that if he was innocent ,he should not have known, is incrimminating. I believe this jury got it right despite the bad police work in 1990.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Sue Doe — Sun, 11 May 2008 12:44:37 GMT

I believe he is guilty and his tears at the end were the most fake I have ever seen. He was sorry he got caught, that is all. Yes, I believe the slight, bearded man was the girlfriend. She was the lookout. 12 jurors weighed the evidence and agreed. There is no hard evidence but enough motive to take a look at the circumstantial evidence - you don't always have Professor Cherry in the library with a candlestick. Nice idea but in real life it doesn't always work that way.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Anonymous Windber Pa — Sun, 11 May 2008 17:05:21 GMT

I watched the episode the Comic Book Murder and I personally was offended by the news correspondent's description of Windber and likened it to Appalachia. Apparently this reporter did no investigating whatsoever. Windber is a small town rich in history and heritage as the first model coal town. It houses the presigious Windber Research Institute that has a primary focus on women's cancer. It has technology that can communicate with Walter Reed Hospital and other well known hospitals in a nano second. We have a Breast Care Center that John Edwards wife came to visit and was so impressed with it and the fact that we have state of the art technology that surpasses other breast care centers. We have the Arcadia Theater which is now known as a regional theater, where people as far away as Virginia come to see our venue with our top of the line entertainment. We have restaurants where famous people have dined. We have an ecclectic bar that Paul Newman came to while he was making slap shot. Our children placed highest in their school tests across Pennsylvania. We have a great wealth of intelligence that comes from the people in Windber. We are the home of the first "Tarzan" and Olympic Champion, Johnny Weismueller and Alan Freed who was the disc jockey that coined the phrase "rock and roll". Appalachia...I think not. Perhaps your investigative reporter should investigate before such a remark is made on national television that speaks far from the truth.
If anywhere is Appalachia it is the town in Michigan that convicted a man on no evidence and collusion. The police had nothing and looked for no other suspects and selected the easiest target just to clear his father's botched investigation. Whether he did it or not has yet to be proven, but in a court of law in this country it is to be beyond a reasonable doubt, and there was much doubt. There has to be doubt in that jury's mind still to this day and I am not sure how they live with themselves. What a travesty.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

shawn paul ,atlantic city, NJ — Sun, 11 May 2008 20:08:16 GMT

The previous comments on this blog hit the nail right on the head. there was no evidence to convict.whats more it never should have went to trial.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

jim walsh Alexandria, Ky — Sun, 11 May 2008 21:09:50 GMT

my biggest problem with conviction was why would the killer shoot the wall, to warn and then make the victim kneel down and shoot her in the head. the husband would not have done that.. the wife would not kneel for him. he was after all her husband.. this was a stranger, or maybe the girlfriend. He said; when confrounted 18 years later.. that the bullet was for him. was he into something sinister.. there was a lot of money around for a comic shop in a small town. was the shop a front for something. He owed $ and life insurance paid his debt. the killer could have ans the phone and was curt. There was a killer, but not the husband. did he have something to do with it.. I doubt it.. except maybe get in over his head some how. a jelous husband or pissed off girl friend. Bad call and the Judge knew it going in.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Judy — Sun, 11 May 2008 23:28:53 GMT

The man in the wheel chair is a suspect in my opinion. At the time of the murder, he looked a lot like the hooded, bearded man seen hanging about the area of the store. He held interest in classic comic books. Perhaps he had traded one or sold one to the owners of the store. He realized it's value afterwards. The evening of the murder, he placed a call to the store and talked with the wife. When she refused to sell it back, he became angry and threatened her. When she went to Hungry Howie's she was nervous and upset. Returning to her store, she was met by the young man with the hood (the wheel chair man). He took her to the back room at gunpoint. All he wanted was that certain comic book with a very high value. He shot her and took the two boxes she had pointed out as containing that book. Later he lied about talking to the husband in order to place suspicion away from himself. His coworker may have been involved too. I am not saying he did it for certain; only that it seems possible and needs to be investegated. The only way to find the truth is to eliminate the lies.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Penny Danbury, Dubuque, Iowa — Mon, 12 May 2008 03:18:38 GMT

There are a lot of things in this case when put together point in the direction of pre-meditated murder. There were things about this case that either Dateline chose not to present or that the prosecution has held back for the possibility of a re-trial or perhaps as some have speculated, the prosecution of his girlfriend. I am reluctant to bring them to light in this forum because I do not want to jeopardize this case if it is not closed.
I will agree with you that it looks like they are convicting on virtually nothing, but there is and was much more than this program showed you. I do know the parties involved in this case.
For the person who called his sister-in-law a bimbo-- shame on you. She is a wonderful wife and mom, just like her dearly departed sister.
I understand what you are saying about people not crying at funerals and believe me that was not the basis of people finding Michael's behavior strange. When a man sits apart from any family member and refuses to talk and greet people as they pay their respects, surrounds himself with men who act like bodyguards-- well let me say, it is a strange way to act at your wife's funeral. Yes, I was there. If you don't know all the facts, and I don't fault you for that, you don't really know what I do. He is guilty. I have suspected it for 18 years.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Karrie Smith, PA — Mon, 12 May 2008 04:06:42 GMT

Way too many "what ifs" for me.. I think they should look more into maybe the second wife or better yet the bearded man, did anyone look into it?

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Penny, Dubuque, IA — Mon, 12 May 2008 13:10:36 GMT

Lots of circumstances in this case.
1. He can be found answering the phone in the store very near the time of the murder. The witness was certain of the time because it was his usual break time at work when he called. He said it 18 years ago, why the police missed that, well... bad police work.
2. He wanted out of the marriage. Barb would have none of it even when he was cheating literally in her face in a swimming pool at a party. She was very aware and still wanted to stay together for the kids I'll guess.
3. He sold insurance and knew that husbands should carry more insurance than the wife. Yet, he upped the coverage on his wife while letting his policies expire.
4. He promptly moved out of the trailer park and into a single family home with Renee courtesy of the insurance money.
5. A botched robbery yet no comics or money of which there was over a grand was touched.
6 Eighteen years later he changes his story to people wanting to kill him, not a robbery. Wouldn't you have been a little worried and want some police protection if that were the case? A shifting story. He's had 18 years to think about it and realized how ridiculous the robbery theory was.
7. Yes sometime people don't cry at funerals, but they usually meet and greet family when come to pay respects, don't they? Do they sit on a sofa surrounded by men/boys sunglasses on all day and do nothing? He was completely unapproachable at the funeral. Oh, but besides his boy posse, Renee was hovering around him like a moth to a flame.
8. Don't even want to get into the fast car driving by and the small "man" in hat and beard. Her day is coming.
So,yes we have no gun, no witness. I don't think there was a witness around when Andrea Yeager drove her kids into a lake. She was guilty and so is Michael George.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jane Doe — Mon, 12 May 2008 13:17:29 GMT

question: the guy has two daughters - why was there just one crying for him at the trial?
question: did the police ever investigate other possibilities? his lover for instance, had a motive to kill -

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Fred Garvin — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:37:02 GMT

One of the jurors from the case was on local radio here in the Detorit area today and basically said the phone call was the deciding factor. He said it placed him at the scene. Gee, I hope the guy's memory is good to recall when he talked to someone SEVENTEEN YEARS AGO!! Talk about a miscarriage of justice. No forensic evidence, no phone records, not one shred of proof. I am scared to think that this can happen.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Jamie Tampa, FL — Mon, 12 May 2008 20:28:08 GMT

Why did the police test his hands for gun residue? Or ask the girlfriend where she was at? Just because the mans car was outside his mom's house doesn't mean his girlfriend didnt come and pick him up. I do believe this man was guilty, how do u explain the man in the wheelchair? Obviously he was there around the time of the murder, and only 1 of the 2 people who had a key to the backdoor. He could have easily done it, but it was him picking up the phone that got him convicted. I hope his motion for appeal is DENIED and stays in his cell where he belongs! Poor kids..

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Audimar Bangi, Cary, North Carolina — Mon, 12 May 2008 21:24:32 GMT

Guilty, guilty, guilty! A classic example of a murder case based purely on strong circumstantial evidence. I commend the brave and impartial jurors for getting the verdict right, in the process putting this liar and murderer person behind bars forever. He thought he got away with a perfect murder. For those who say "not guilty -- no forensic evidence, no DNA, no murder weapon, lots of reasonable doubt, etc", give me a break.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

John Smith, Pennsylvania — Tue, 13 May 2008 00:42:04 GMT

When a family spends 17 years telling their neighbors that "So-and-so killed my sister," and a member of the jury is actually dismissed from the case for being related to a member of the prosecutor's office, there is no such thing as an "impartial jury."

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Bub — Tue, 13 May 2008 01:58:17 GMT

The husband has a witness seeing him and his daughters leaving the book store a little around 5:00. His mother is a witness that he is at her house at 5:30. A neighbor is a witness that his car is in his mother's driveway between 5:30 and 6:00.It is a half hour drive from the book store to his mother's house!One Way! How did he make a half hour trip to the store,and another half hour trip back to his mom's house between 5:30 and 6:00? Now let's look at who else might have had some financial gane around the time of the murder.How about the wheelchair guy and his friend, which by the way there is a eye witness who saw two people lurking around the store. I know that to have eye witnesses doesn't seem to matter ,verses a man saying he made a phone call between 5:15 & 5:45 and having no proof of it taking place at the time he said,or if it did take place at all. This needs to be looked into again by someone who will use what is proven over what isn't!!!

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Monique Renaud,MI — Tue, 13 May 2008 03:33:53 GMT

The Man in the wheelchair is my father and im sooo proud of what he did. Hes a great man, back in 1990 my dad called the police three times and even went in to the police station for an interview.The interview was never brought up on the show and the trial. Thats how he remembers what time he called the comic book store.I think its amazing how my father just by luck called the store and Michael answered.Things happen for a reason. I believe Michael killed his wife.
If anyone has questions I will check in later

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Penny — Tue, 13 May 2008 14:47:07 GMT

The star witness did not have to recall at what time and whom he spoke to at the store 17 years ago. He told the police that information days after the murder. Dontcha think he wondered why nobody acted on it? Dontcha think he wouldn't have forgotten about it regardless? Dontcha think it's kinda strange that Michael Goerge's attorney was the presecutor for the county when he committed the crime? If this verdict is reversed, I smell all sorts of corruption and coverup here.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Cheryl Gloucester MA — Tue, 13 May 2008 17:44:36 GMT

Do I think he is guilty? Absolutely!
Was it proven in court beyond a reasonable doubt? Absolutely not!

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Penny — Tue, 13 May 2008 17:55:19 GMT

Monique Renaud... what did your dad think when he had this evidence and the police did nothing about it for so long? What did they say when he told them about the call 17 years ago?

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

gary brink 5799tr264millersburg ohio 44654 — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:23:30 GMT

The jury almost got it right ,murder one being the accompolice.They were wrong that she had no enemies. A conniving desperate misstress had more to gain than the generic husband.They should check her relatives and freinds houses for a borrowed gun which might be a bolistics match.The hooded person didn't show up there for a constipated camel convention,it was probably her with fake facial hair.She had a key and was likely the one speeding away from the scene donning a greek hat appearing as a man.In that small room i do not think he would miss the first shot. More logical she missed and killed barbara as she dove for the gun knocking over the cartons. The detective was wrong saying the only way the husband knew in advance of the head injury was him being there.I think she called him after she did it with the info. One is more apt to slip up on secondhand info than actually being there. No halfminded womem would marry a man that may have commited murder,endangering her 5 children unless she was deeply involved.The times were too close not to have a margin of error with many possibilities i can think of.It was easy for him to be smug thinking i will not be found guilty as i am the accompolice not the killer telling lies will be easy.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Irene E. Center Line, MI — Thu, 15 May 2008 21:11:51 GMT

I know Michael and Barbara George—not personally but on a business level. I was their accountant when they first opened their store in Clinton Township. I watched with great interest the Dateline feature. I was hoping that there would have been some jaw dropping evidence to say they have the right person. I still feel uneasy about the verdict but we do not have all of the testimony, just the highlights of the highlights.

What did I experience in the personality of the Georges? I could tell their marriage was strained/stressed. Barbara seemed to be always upbeat, friendly, etc., where Michael appeared to have an attitude problem and “snippy”. I really didn’t care for him but I realized the world is made up of all types of people and I’ve dealt with people like him.

When I had obtained a full time position, I couldn’t continue my work for Michael and Barbara and suggested they find another accountant. Shortly afterwards, Barbara was murdered. At the time of the murder, I was out of town and did not learn of the event until I returned the following week. In a small article in the newspaper, it said there were no suspects at the time. I read the previous papers and recall reading that no money was taken and all the expensive comics were still at the store. That was very strange. The paper also talked about the surprise birthday party. I had a feeling at that moment that I would not put it passed Michael George that he did it or had hired someone to take out his wife.

Michael George hired the best lawyer in town-Carl Marlinga. He is far better than Geoffrey Fieger!! I met Mr. Marlinga when he filed a class action suit against a corporation for racketeering. He is the best! He was also the prosecuting attorney in Macomb County where the crime took place and was tried. Therefore, he is very experienced in representing plaintiffs and defendants and prosecuting.

Dateline stated that Michael George was at the store at 5:00ish and made it to his mom’s house and was sound asleep on the couch when she came home from the park with his children at 6:00. It also mentioned the Barbara ordered pizzas for the birthday party around 5:30. I can tell you, it would be very difficult to travel from their store to mom’s house in such a short time—in rush hour traffic. I would guess it would take about 30 minutes to travel in ideal situations—rush hour would have added to the time. I know—I travel this tri-county area everyday. Something is not adding up here. I believe Michael’s mom is covering for him. And his daughter remembering Michael sleeping on grandma’s couch? I don’t think so.

Over the years I wondered if there was any resolution to the crime. At times, I wanted to contact Clinton Township Police to see if the case was cold or closed. At other times, I was actually thinking of calling John Walsh at America’s Most Wanted to do some investigating. But, who am I? Just a former accountant to a murder woman with her husband convicted of the crime. If Michael George is innocent, fill in the holes—make this add up for him. If he truly is guilty, let him rot.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Monique Renaud, MI — Fri, 16 May 2008 04:26:27 GMT

Penny,
well,in response to your question, My dad had no idea what Mike Georges alibi was, so when they didn't do anything with the my dad's statement, he just thought his information wasn't important. After all, it was up to the police to make a case and for all he knew, it might not have been relevant. Fast forward, 17 yrs later, they found the record of the initial call in the file, which is why they call my dad when this case was re-opened. That is why he knew what time the call was made because it was right there in black and white from his initial statement the day after the murder. Some people's comments crack me up about my dad having a "hero" complex, so not like him at all....

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Irene E. Center Line, MI — Fri, 16 May 2008 17:52:17 GMT

FYI--Hearing on 5/15 resulted in the following:
(Taken from Macomb County, MI public access).
Docket Entries

Date Text
05/15/2008 REQUESTS/NOTICES FOR FILM/ELECTRONIC MEDIA COVERAGE OF COURT PROCEEDINGS BY MACOMB DAILY AND DETROIT NEWS
05/15/2008 ORAL OPINION TO RENDER (MTN FOR DIRECTED VERDICT) The following event: HRG ON MTN FOR DIRECTED VERDICT scheduled for 05/15/2008 at 8:30 am has been rescheduled as follows: Event: ORAL/WRITTEN OPINION TO RENDER Date: 05/23/2008 Time: 8:30 am Judge: BIERNAT SR, JAMES M Location: COURTROOM G - 4TH FLOOR
05/15/2008 HELD: PLACED ON RECORD, ARGUMENTS HEARD, COURT TO RENDER ITS RULING ON 5/23/08 @ 8:30 AM, IN CUST -SGD (CRT RPTR: PAM LINDSAY) The following event: HRG ON MTN FOR DIRECTED VERDICT scheduled for 05/15/2008 at 8:30 am has been resulted as follows: Result: HELD-CRIMINAL Judge: BIERNAT SR, JAMES M Location: COURTROOM G - 4TH FLOOR Result Staff: Staff: COURT REPORTER: LITTLE, ANGELA Certification Number: CSR-6444

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Dennis, United States of America — Fri, 16 May 2008 18:52:46 GMT

They is never an end to most of the murder trials and cases

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

john doe — Sat, 17 May 2008 03:23:21 GMT

this man could have done this crime but without the evidence how can u take away a mans right and throw him in prison?there is most certainly a resonable doubt!wtf

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Lou arizona — Sun, 18 May 2008 23:15:04 GMT

He did it, He did it, He did it and thought he had got away with it. he moved away because he is a coward and could not look the people in Mich in the face, he also took Barb's children away from her family the only connection they have to their sister. I hope in rot in jail and in hell

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Big mikey, weston florida — Mon, 19 May 2008 02:40:55 GMT

wow, that is all i have to says to you people who think he was proven guilty. In america you are proven guility beyond a reason doubt and there is no one who can say he was. does being bad spouse, and a bad person make some some one guilty of murdered? No. But the scary thing is there are a lot of people who think it does. So to all the people who cheat on your spouse and something happenes to them you are going down becaause there are a lot of crazy peope out there.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Mike Clauberg — Wed, 28 May 2008 16:37:19 GMT

I just think he might of done it, but, the Jury could not convict him with all the evidence that worked in his favor. The jury all went on one guys rememberance of 17 years ago on who answered the phone, and he knew this because he remembered what time he went to work that day. I am sitting during a period off, and I can't believe the bell has not rung yet, I just checked my phone, and I still have 9 minutes left and I thought it should of run 5 minutes ago. Time and work, You just can't convict. Sometimes, you have to side on the judgement of presumed innocent, if you don't have enough evidence. Bottom line. Otherwise, anyone can convict anyone and our justice system doesn't work. It's bad enough, people are being overturned everywhere who has been jailed for years thanks to forsenic evidence. All circumstancial in this case. Not enough facts. I couldn't believe they convicted him guilty, even know he might of done it.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Marty, Dallas Texas — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:03:36 GMT

I am so tired of people forgetting the victim. This man was a horrible husband who cheated on his wife whom I believe he murdered. I also believe that his new wife knows all about it. If he did not do it then who did? It is like the O.J. trial only hopefully another killer will not get away. And for those of you who say that emotions are not important, let me ask you this. If someone told you that they were opening up the case of your murdered loved one, would you not be happy? There are certain emotions I want to see from a loved one of a victim. In all of the cases I have ever seen, the guilty just can't fake those emotions. Even when they try most people can tell that they are fake. Thank God that he made us that way.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Ashley ,Md — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:09:32 GMT

The police should of done better jobs at collecting evidence... like testing for gun shot residue. Though i due think he did it he showed no emotion up till the part when he was convicted. And he tried to us his daughter as a witness saying he was napping... i think she was four then... how would she remember between him telling her thats what daddy was doing or if he really did. HE DID IT.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

kim lifton — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 05:07:55 GMT

Great show. Great prosecution. Sad, sad story. In the end, it appears as if jusice was served.

Kim, Huntington Woods, MI

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

M, Pa — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:22:40 GMT

I feel terrible for any married man who lives in Michigan. If something ever happens to his wife it seems that he will get convicted of murder with no evidence.

Just this past week there was another special on dateline "the mystery at picture rocks." Same situation as the George trial. No physical evidence, no witnesses, and a guilty verdict. I feel terrible for the children of these men who already lost their mothers but now with no evidence still they lost their fathers. I hope i do not go on trial in Michigan for anything, I already know I would be guilty.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

JC, Miami, FL — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:15:15 GMT

Sure, I suspect he did it - There was motive and if he's innocent he is just plain stupid. But there is REASONABLE DOUBT. There was nothing physically linking him to the crime scene. Also, the police never tested him for gun powder or gave him a lie detector. The police screwed up on this case. This was just very wrong and a terrible example of our justice system. The criteria used to convict him could easily be used to frame and convict any one of the million unfaithful husbands who's wives happen to have a life insurance policy. It's gonna sound stupid, but he's getting life in prison for not crying and acting "normal" after his wife's murder... that's all they really had on on him. WOW.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

William Gardner — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:37:14 GMT

How close did they check the guy in the wheel-chair. It may sound crazy that he felt the need to explain why he called thirty minutes before the lady was killed. Could it be that he was concerned about phone call records? I know it sounds far-fetched but any jury who could find a person guilty based on this type of case is pretty far-fetched too. I thought that law-enforcement was charged with protecting the rights of the citizens. Does that not include the suspect. Is not the law charged to conduct a complete investigation to protect against anyone being found guilty who might be innocent? What about the first surprise interview where the law wore a hidden recorder while interviewing the main suspect. Is that really admissable? Lots of holes in this case. Frankly even if the man did it he should still be free due to the trash case brought by the prosecution based on old memories and emotionalism.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Mark, Dallastown, PA — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:56:11 GMT

I just saw this story on what was clearly a rerun. I seriously believe that the man (or his wife Renee, with help from him - or else how would she get the key to get in the back of the store) committed this crime. You just don't hear about your wife's death - even if you DO want a divorce from her - without any emotion. There are people I don't really like much, but if I heard that they had died, I would at least register shock and ask 'how?' and 'what happened?'. Just like I did when I found out that a kid I knew from middle school (didn't like, but knew) was accused of assaulting another person. I wanted to know what happened and if he would get convicted. Also, there is a REASON that Michael George married her in the first place, so even if he grew apart from her and didn't want to be her husband any more, he should still care that she is DEAD...this isn't a temporary thing, she is DEAD. And while all of this is going on with her death, he is fat and happy with wife-number-2-to-be...just doesn't add up to an innocent man...and I loved that bit about a 21-year old girl remembering when she was 4...I am 23, and DAMNED if I can TRULY remember a THING from when I was 4. I remember what is pictured in the scrapbooks and what I have been told and since learned happened then...your mind is not formed enough to keep clear memories when you are that young.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

TG — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:06:26 GMT

I agree with most of the above comments!

No evidence that the husband did it. No physical evidence at all! A real black eye for law enforcment.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

Dan Allen Park MI — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:41:20 GMT

I knew Michael George when he lived in Michigan as I have been in the comic industry for over 20 years. What I can say is that after the murder, EVERYONE knew he was cheating and EVERYONE in the our industry thought he was the murderer. I believed it then, and I believe it now. Of course the evidence presented in the case is purely circumstancial, but if I was innocent, I would have taken the stand and told the judge, the jury, and anyone else who would listen to me that I was no murderer. I don't care that he didn't cry...he wasn't happy being married thus he may not have felt a loss...but the fact that, as a former life-insurance salesman, he had 2 policies on her for close to 200,000 and only one on himself for 30,000 when the general rule of thumb is to have the spouse with a higher earning capacity to carry more coverage...that's suspicious. Add in the fact that he LIED to police about having an affair...what you end up with is a man with motive, who is a habitual liar and cannot be trusted, had access to the victim, and who...while "grieving"...quickly moved in with and then married his girlfriend. Is it really that difficult to imagine such a person capable of murder? One last thing that sticks with me...his "box of Golden Age Comics" that was stolen...he couldn't remember a single one! Imagine you owned 50 cars and somebody stole 10 of them...I'm pretty sure you would remember EVERY SINGLE VEHICLE missing. I remember exactly every expensive book that has ever been stolen from my shop...and you would too. For some reason, he can't name a single one. All these things add up to a point where I can understand how the jury came back with a guilty verdict without the aid of physical evidence.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

todd, fort madison, ia — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:48:18 GMT

That conviction was brutal. That DA and the investigators crossed the line in this frame up to convict this guy for the DA's dead dad. No murder weapon, no witness, no gunshot residue test, no confession, no canvas of the neighborhood, I don't get it. I mean a jury needs to be given proof of guilt which there was none in this case. In a lot of cases, I would rather have a bench trial because jurors can't be impartial. Verdicts like this make me sick.

The “Comic Book Murder” -- is it really the end?

deb, costa mesa, ca — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:41:53 GMT

unbelievable! i actually enjoyed reading these blogs. even when i disagreed, everyone was so thoughtful. i hope we hear more about the trial follow-up. it's hard to believe what transpired but editing did make this look like george was convicted by a group out to get him after messing up years ago. as a nation we seem to be going down slippery slopes more often than not. (getmo, abu graib)