ABOUT INSIDE DATELINE

Inside Dateline is your Web line into Studio 3B, providing you with a personal behind-the-scenes look at how we bring you our stories.

Whether it's a gripping crime tale, a hidden camera investigation, or a celebrity newsmaker profile -- Dateline correspondents and producers spend days, months, and sometimes even years researching and reporting the story. Learn more about what goes on inside our investigations, and find out more about some of the people we've met.

Ann Curry hosts Dateline. Dateline's producers, correspondents and host post here often. Previews to upcoming stories, more information on our reports, and follow-ups can be found on this blog.



Life patterns

Posted: Friday, April 18, 2008 7:23 PM by Dateline Editor
Filed Under:

By Chetna Purohit, Dateline NBC

One of the most interesting aspects of this case to me was that, even though there was no body, no physical evidence of a crime and, essentially, no smoking gun, detectives still had plenty to investigate. The biggest clue they had into the disappearance of Ann Racz was Ann herself.

Ann lived her life with strict organization and was exceptionally meticulous about documenting the mundane details of her life.  When detectives entered Ann's condo, they found letters with Post-it notes detailing dates when they needed to be mailed.  Her calendar read like a diary of everything she had done and all that she planned to do.  And a Boboli pizza sat on the kitchen counter -- dinner that she had promised her children the day she disappeared. 

Ann's life was in the details and those details established a roadmap of her life.  When the activities stopped, it was clear Ann's life had reached a dead end. Detectives were struck by Ann's biggest life pattern: her devotion to her children.

Her life revolved around her kids' soccer games and PTA meetings, and detectives believed a mother so involved in her children's lives would not just pick up and leave without leaving a plan for them. Detectives were certain that when Ann's life patterns ceased, so did her life.

The case made me reflect on the mundane details of my own life and how those regular occurrences that I take for granted are what actually give meaning to my life.

Click here for more on this case.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

It seems to me hard to fathom with a case with no body, no physical evidence of a crime and, essentially, no smoking gun, that someone can go to prison for something that cannot be proven that is an astonishment!
The news reports added another interesting detail.  As one of the children was planning on having a wedding in the backyard of their home, the investigation lead the police to dig up the back yard to look for Mrs, Racz's body.

The poor children being subjected to reading all of the letters and their home being turned upside down after 16 year of waiting and wondering....  
I watched the Dateline program about this case.  I have been on several juries, myself, and, honestly, I was a bit surprised the jury found him guilty on just the circumstantial evidence.  At least from what was broadcast on the program.

I was curious about the $25,000 he supposedly gave his wife.  The Dateline website has very little info. about the cash.  As best I can determine, he withdrew the money, but it's not mentioned if in fact it was deposited to her account.

I'd be curious to know if his finances were ever examined.  Whether he had $25,000 extra in his finances/assets for which he is unable to explain, or if the $25,000 was actually deposited (and I assume remained)into her account, or if the $25,000 is missing or unaccounted for could be suggestive of different conclusions.  I find it substantially relevent whether the money is unaccounted for or not.

One of her complaints was about his penny-pinching ways.  Someone so concerned about "appearance" and money, as he is portrayed, may be reluctant to simple "dispose" of $25,000.  Greed has been the down-fall of many before and will undoubtedly continue to be again.

Is anyone aware of the $25,000?
I forgot to ask if there was any explanation as to why Ann was supposedly resorting to feeding the kids McDonalds the night of her disappeasrance.  She had promised them pizza and the Boboli was still out, ready to be prepared.

What was her reason or the explanation/theory for her going to McDonalds?
Primetime Suspect..this was a very interesting story
and it all points to the husband.My family situation
was so bad I had to move away and this "control"man
issues reminded me of my Dad. I thank God I got
the hell out and moved to NV. I have a normal
life now and greatful for that. You did an excellent
job with the story,,,I feel for the kids..and
what they had to go through, Rose
If CBS wants to become number one in news, I suggest putting Stone Phillips in place of Katie Couric  NBC & ABC will be far, far, far behind.
Throughout your investigative report not once did you suspect the boyfriend. What if she as the husband said  left to think strait and went to the boyfriends to break off the relationship and he killed her. I can't believe a so called investigative show did not once mention that possibility.?
I'm sorry I did not leave my city and country. The boyfriend!!!!
Very interesting show. Similar to the current Drew Peterson case. Wonder if this will turn out the same, but hopefully sooner than 16 - 17 yrs!  
Do the sisters get along since they have different thoughts about their father's guilt?


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://insidedateline.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=919509