ABOUT INSIDE DATELINE

Inside Dateline is your Web line into Studio 3B, providing you with a personal behind-the-scenes look at how we bring you our stories.

Whether it's a gripping crime tale, a hidden camera investigation, or a celebrity newsmaker profile -- Dateline correspondents and producers spend days, months, and sometimes even years researching and reporting the story. Learn more about what goes on inside our investigations, and find out more about some of the people we've met.

Ann Curry hosts Dateline. Dateline's producers, correspondents and host post here often. Previews to upcoming stories, more information on our reports, and follow-ups can be found on this blog.



'Did you kill your husband?'

Posted: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 2:16 PM by Dateline Editor
Filed Under: ,

by Dennis Murphy, Dateline correspondent

"Would you like fries with that?"

"Window or aisle?"

We all have questions that seem to come with our jobs. Mine often is: "Did you kill, your wife (or husband)?"

It's odd. I know it and the question echoes in my head whenever I ask it, usually in the green-walled tank of a state prison or county jail, the one-time accused, by then the convicted, denying to me, as they had in court, that they would ever think of doing such a thing--murdering their spouse.

The woman sitting across from me in a red jumpsuit on this occasion is Piper Rountree. She's a mother of three in her late 40's, easy smile, smart eyes. Piper looks for all the world like the suburban mom she once was, wondering whether she has time to gas up the SUV before picking up the girls at piano lessons.

But this is a state prison for women in Virginia and so I ask Piper my occupational question.

"Did you kill your ex-husband, Fred?"

"No", she replied. She denied waiting in the driveway for her husband of almost 20 years. Denied firing three shots, hitting him twice as he walked to pick up the paper in his bedclothes.

In court, the prosecutor had described a murder plot elaborately planned and so ineptly carried out that detectives were onto the ex-wife within hours of the killing.

 When people asked me what I was working on I'd tell them a woman accused of killing her ex-husband. They'd think about it for a second and say-- as a juror in this case did-- she must have snapped.

Snapped. Curious. I can't recall anyone ever saying that of a male killer--a husband/boyfriend killing a wife/girlfriend. He must have snapped.

This is the third story I've done about a woman who kills-- it's almost a genre on-line: women who kill-- but in my very limited experience, it strikes me that the facts of a domestic murder are gender neutral. All three women were convicted of killing a partner after--according to prosecutors-- giving considerable thought as to how they were going to both commit the murder and get away with it.

Snapped had nothing to do with it. And now the question, did you kill your husband, is in no way more shocking, more taboo to me, than did you kill your wife.

Dennis Murphy's report on Piper Rountree, "Murder in Hearthglow Lane," airs Dateline Tuesday, 8 p.m.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

SHE WILL PROBABLY WIN ON APPEAL FOR TEMPORARY INSANITY.  WHEN DO WE AS AMERICANS SAY I DONT CARE IF THEY WERE MENTAL, WE CANNOT ALLOW PEOPLE TO DO THIS.  I DONT UNDERSTAND THE SYSTEM IN THIS COUNTRY.  TOO MANY PEOPLE DO NOT DO THE TIME THEY DESERVE.  
Women can be ruthless, uncaring and down right cruel.  They don't snap....I believe more men snap then women do.  Being a woman, I have seen the calculating way they (women) are when they feel they have been 'wronged'.  Most men act out of anger, spur of the moment type of action.  A lot of women think before they 'get even' or give what's coming to the person.  I am not trying to generalize women...but I know more 'evil and vindictive' women then I do men.  Sad state our society is in, which is why I keep to myself.
Until we know all of the facts we cannot say what motivated this woman to kill her ex, so, don't judge her until all of the facts are known.
I agree, we don't know her motive or the reasons behind them. Many men kill because of jealousy, greed , or for the thrill. Many women want revenge for the wrong the felt. Many women that kill have an underlying reason whether they were battered by anyone or felt in danger.
As a woman, I have been wronged by plenty of men in my time and have definitely felt like I could snap. But, come on, killing is the last thing on my mind, I'd rather get even, not end a life because they made me mad!! This woman definitely thought this through and made a choice to end her ex husbands life, she should go to prison and never see the light of day! No one, no matter what the ex'husband did, deserves to be killed!!
As a woman from an all around abusive relationship. I can say that there are many times I thought harsh thoughts, but it was just that thoughts. There is no excuse for taking a life. That is not our decsion to make.
What did the Bard say? "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." In her case, the facts suggest a woman increasingly driven to an act of passion. That said, I cannot help but wonder if the tragedy could have been avoided had the system helped her get on her feet. Seems to me as that her inability to secure bankruptcy was the last straw. What sense does it make to force somebody trying to get back on their feet -- howsoever troubled or angry -- from doing so?
i would think that TINA murdered piper's husband
Can someone tell me why this lady lost coustidy of her children? i missed that part and it is very rare that a mother loses coustidy in a divorce.
If the sexes were reversed, the man would have been convicted before the trial. If she wanted to get off, all she had to do was say her husband abused her.
she had an affair with a local doctor during the marrage,she would bring the kids along on dates w/ dr- thats why Fred got custody. she wanted to revenge for Fred getting custody . Those kids will never be the same
WHY THE HELL DID HE GET CUSTODY?????????????? THAT IS SOOOOO WRONG.
Can someone tell me why this lady lost coustidy of her children? i missed that part and it is very rare that a mother loses coustidy in a divorce.
Not covered in depth is why or how a mother (stay at home)lost primary custody to the working father?? In the State of VA. yet alone most States the mother must be quilty of serious offenses, substance abuse problems, etc... In addition, many times a stay at home spouse is granted temporary alimony to allow them time to renew or find a career because of the time spent removed from the working world. Not only did she not receive temporary consideration for the years at home but she was ordered to pay $900.00 p/month child support prior to re-establishing her career. Something has been left out of this story or it sounds like the fix was in!! Did she appeal?? If not then why didn't she? What is missing????
I am still confused as to how she lost custody and why she had to move so far away from her kids. If she was the great mother as stated, how does she become a long distant mother. If she is really guilty, her sister probubly helped her plan it because she knew she had a solid aliby.
My heart goes out to her, sometimes the court system is the cause of making wether men or women in a divorce situations to snap, why should the husband be given the custody of the children he was never around to take care of other than to show up for dinner? I don't condone what she did if she did it, but it is certainly too much for her to bear, to take away her children from her? I hate those judges sometimes. I have been there. I myself have snapped and became verbally abusive to a judge before risking being in contempt. I hope she is free and pick up the pieces of her life with the children she carried for 9 months.
Her husband stole the kids from her-you don't know what pain she went thru so don't judge this lady-u did not lead her life
what about the kids? there is no excuse.
Someone has to be totally illogical to think that because her husband took away her kids ("won a totally legal court case") she should not be judged for getting even ("killing the father of her children in cold blood for revenge").
No one knows what goes on behind closed doors. Until you walk a mile in her shoes, none of us has a right to pass judgement on this woman. I was in an abusive marriage which ended in the death of my husband at my own hand. A jury of my peers found me not guilty. I had used battered woman's defense. No one, not even my family, knew of the abuse. Only God knows what happened to Ms. Rountree's ex-husband.
I am just as curious as the few others who have mentioned it...Why did a stay at home mom lose custody of her kids and have to pay child support...Something is fishy that Dateline didn't divulge...Maybe Dateline thought it would skew our view of the facts in the case if we knew why a stay at home mom would lose custody of her kids...
Yes, mothers do loose custody of their children, I do know. I went through a bitter divorce and my ex got everything! That was then this is now, our relationship is better and I do have my children half of the time. The evidence is there, especially the cell phone... but the police not catching her after the plane arrives at the gate? That's where I'm confussed .... I feel for these children, they lost both of their parents. What's best for them?
Why is it always thought that a woman is always a better parent? No one knows if the man was only a dinner dad. It is stated we cannot judge the woman, so be it we cannot judge the man. What we do know are certain facts: she had an affair, she brought her children on the dates with a man NOT their father, she lost her children in a court(Normaly geared favorably towards women) AND fact, the husband is dead.
I was in a bad marrage I was abused, night after night I thought how would I rid myself of my ex. I had a 9 month old daughter. I did my own divorce. and 18 years later my daughter and I are doing great. thou shall not kill. mabe she didnt do it for her kids sake I pray not.
Nobody really knows what went on behind closed doors during their marriage. People can guess and spread rumors but NOBODY really knows. I could understand her getting upset about losing her children...heck, who wouldn't be? But I think she planned this...(if she did it at all). It doesn't look good for her, but I hate the word SNAPPED!! She waited for him and then shot him...thats not snapping! Snapping would be if they got into an argument and then she shot him. Either way something set her off.
There are many things that were omitted from the interview and from the story. This is a lady with emotional problems. My family and I now own and live in the house where Dr. Jablin was murdered. I have come to know the neighbors and have talked with them. There is much more to the story than was covered on Dateline. Piper has her own distorted view of life. Of course, much of it I've gotten second hand from those neighbors, but one thing from Murphy's interview struck me as consonant that second hand information: she mentioned a "fish pond" in the back yard. There is no fish pond. That, like so much of what I've heard, is apparently only in her mind.
I think there is more to the story. The details of the divorce are very sketchy. I think more was there than was told in any articles I read.
this is such a sad case.... the ones who really lost were the children, imagine growing up knowing that your mum killed your dad... pray for those kids... because they have a tought road ahead of them..
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO JUSTIFICATION IN TAKING SOMEONE'S LIFE. AND THERE IS NO MAN ON THE FACE OF THIS EARTH WORTH GOING TO JAIL FOR. I HAVE BEEN WRONGED BY MEN.... WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND IN ITS OWN TIME. I HAVE NO SYMPATHY FOR ANYONE WHO TAKES A LIFE AND THE EVIDENCE WAS DEFINITELY STACKED AGAINST HER. SHE WILL NEVER WIN AN APPEAL.
Whats left out is the arrogant assumption by lawyers and judges that a law degree in any way qualifies a judge to determine what represents the best interests of the children and the FACT that the unnecessarily complicated and easily manipulated processes and procedures of the court turn the whole proceeding into a contest to determine the most accomplished liar. The presumption that judges and lawyers are honorable cannot be justified.
why is everyone so quick to judge? If i were one of the jurors, i would not convict till I am absolutely sure. What piper did was wrong, but trust me if anyone dare take my children from me, I will kill. I am a lioness when it comes to my kids and will do anything to protect them, and my spouse knows that. God gave mothers that instinct to protect our children. I can imagine what what it will be like not being able to be with them. It was so wrong for her to do that, but in cases like these, people do act without thinking twice about how wrong the whole action is. If she wasn't abusing her kids, why the hell did she loose custody. For me it like this - you can always replace a husband but can NEVER replace your kids! blood is always thicker than water. She was wrong - if she guilty - but I won't be too quick to pour judgement on her because I might have done worse if I were in that situation, infact, i might have either commited suicide after the kids were taken from me or done something drastic. I just wish she could tell us WHY she did that.
why aren't people asking why the lady was cheating? Maybe because the man was never there and the man could have been having an affair too. She had to put her career on hold to care for the kids and her husband went on with his. We have to ask why and not condemn her. no one is born a vilan
WE HAVE A LEGAL SYSTEM FOR A REASON.THERE IS NO EXCUSE HERE IS A WOMAN OF THE LAW.WHAT WAS SHE THINKING AND SO CRULE AND SLOPPY IF SHE DIDN'T DO IT I BELIEVE SHE SURE KNOWS WHO DID SHE A VERY SICK WOMAN..LOU FROM RI
I once set and planned the murder of my drunken abusive husband, but in back of my mind, I was afraid God would punish me thru one of my children (I had four daughters). I ended up just packing and leaving, with my children and raising them alone. Of course he never quit being the bad taste in my mouth, but I did not have to ask forgiveness from God or my children for doing what I wanted to do. Maybe her want to was stronger than her fear.
We all so easily judge, no-one knows her or him so why are all of you giving your opinion, who are you to judge her, our legal system is not perfect as everyone has seen in the past,has anyone ever thought that she might be innocent? What ever happend to compassion?
you know it is sad as in virginia somehow it comes down to instead of innocent until proven guilty it is very well backward here you are guilty until you prove you are innocent that is something to think of for certain this lady says she didint do it who knows the lord knows and we all will face the truth someday


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://insidedateline.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=38802